GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP) is “One to Watch”

GNCC Capital is dead set on proving up reserves through shrewdly directed exploration on the company’s six main properties in Arizona, three of which are gold-focused and three of which are silver-focused, with about an 80-20 mix percentage-wise for gold-silver overall. The company has considerable development guidance in the form of previous documentation on the properties, as well as a clear vision for the necessary analytical work including surveying, sampling, and drilling towards production.

Heavy emphasis on developing the historically well-documented mineral potential at the gold sites in particular is a key objective for GNCP, and the company has taken a committed stance on the share structure, with 12% of outstanding common stock in the hands of company directors and a relatively small free float of trading, unrestricted shares. Balance that against the fact that the company’s veteran leadership remains acquisition hungry and that the directors, in addition to certain shareholders, maintain interests in other mining areas like coal, copper, iron ore, and rare earths, a clear portrait emerges of a company aggressively snapping up underexplored mining projects (gold and silver in particular) with huge production potential.

Looking at the gold properties first we have the 160-acre Burnt Well property (9 unpatented lode mining claims) in La Paz County on BLM-administered lands. Formerly developed by Cordex Exploration, including the Silver Lining Mine, all of the workings on the property are in choice geology (gold-silver-copper) above the regional Bullard Detachment Fault. We have some seriously altered sedimentary rock here just off the fault with Cordex data on the main shaft and adit showing mineralization values as high as 1.0 opt Au, with broader collection in the tertiary rock showing returns on widths over 20 feet of 0.01 to 0.03 opt. Two more shafts roughly a mile southwest from the Silver Lining Mine also shows strong indications of the geologic potential here, having yielded 0.01 opt Au in sampling. The plan will be to follow the clean roadmap laid out by extant Cordex data with some updated magnetic/geophysical surveying and sampling.

The 480-acre (24 lode claims, BLM admin) Clara Gold project, also in La Paz, previously kicked up averages of 0.091 opt Au, with one contiguous chip/channel effort showing 0.162 opt over 85 feet in underground mining (Nevada Pacific, who had acquired the property in 1997) and values as high as 0.512 opt with up to 2.59% copper. With surface sampling showing returns as high as 0.652 opt, including exceptional copper secondaries as high as 20%, in addition to extensive mine workings site-wide from the 90′s by Nevada Pacific and Clara Consolidated Gold & Copper Mining Co., who pioneered the property’s Clara and Moreau Gold Mines, we have an abundance of solid mineralization leads in another clear detachment fault series (here the Buckskin/Rawhide). Plans for Clara are to follow-up the work done by Nevada Pacific with surveying/sampling that can be used to develop ideal drilling targets.

Wrapping up the gold-focused side of the business, we have the 100 acres (5 unpatented lode claims) that make up the Ester Basin properties in Mohave County (Owens Mining District). Again in the Buckskin/Rawhide detachment fault region, Ester Basin was previously explored like the others (here in the 80′s at last effort). Phelps Dodge did a great deal of magnetic, geochemical, and some limited, preliminary drilling which has come down to the company and will serve the forthcoming exploration program well. It is worth noting that Phelps Dodge also did some work over in the Clara area during the latter half of the 80′s (18 air hammer holes), yielding estimates of 2M tons of ore at 0.1 ppm Au. GNCP will be looking to pick up where Phelps Dodge left off, chasing grab sample data targets from the three main on-site shafts, which run as high as 0.412 opt Au and 1.1 opt silver with 1.94% copper. This is Walker Lane trend classic detachment fault mineralization like that seen elsewhere in AZ, with Cyprus Gold’s 500k oz Copperstone open pit operation from the 80′s being a perfect example.

Turning to GNCP’s silver properties we have the 411-acre (24 unpatented lode mining claims, BLM admin) Kit Carson project in beautiful Yavapai County (Big Bug Mining District), with a 50% interest in the 11-acre Lady Alde patented lode claim. The company has quite an undeveloped resource base here, with some 3k feet in the Silver Belt – McCabe Vein System and another 6k in the Kit Carson Vein System (another 3k still in the Lady Alde). This project is smack in between the Iron King Mine (gold-silver-lead-zinc) developed back in the 60′s and Magma’s (later BHP) Gladstone – McCabe Gold Mine developed in the 80′s. Historic data from the Iron King, which saw some $2.6B in production by 2011 prices (some 616.5k oz Au, 18.5M oz Ag, 125.4k tons of lead, 367.6k tons of zinc, and 9.6k tons of copper) occurring from 1942 to 1968, yielded average ore grades as high as 0.123 opt Au and 3.69 opt Ag. Other numerous workings on the site like the Silver Belt mine (14k-foot continuous Silver Belt-McCabe vein) showed historic production worth over $21M in silver by 2011 prices.

Also in Mohave County are the Potts Mountain properties, consisting of some 40 acres (2 unpatented lode mining claims) just north of the Ester Basin property (on the same Buckskin/Rawhide detachment fault). The entire mountain is ringed with mineralization targets and historic producing developments, like the Lead Pill Silver Mine (silver-lead) and Red Top Gold Mine (gold-copper), giving strong indication that the underexploited host rock has tremendous upside potential.

Finally, we have the 80-acre (4 unpatented lode claims) Silverfield project up across the Bill Williams River, again in Mohave County. Previous silver and even gold production on the site ending in the 80′s underscores the potential at the Big Hill and North Star Hill workings, the latter of which is supposed to have a large, completely untapped silver resource. GNCP was very diligent about picking up extant analytical data on the site, something true for all six sites in general, here tagging the logging sets from drilling by Anschutz Mining back in the 80′s. Widespread alteration in conjunction with replacement silver and copper mineralization (including a hot springs-type sinter deposition), taken into context alongside State of Arizona sampling data which even kicked up the presence of vanadium on the site, should give investors a solid perceptual end cap for the company’s silver strategy in Mohave County.

Detailed in a recent update to stockholders is the company’s move to expand its overall regional position through cunning engagement of both North American Gold & Minerals Fund (NMGL, for whom the GNCP Chairman also performs Chairman duties) and an associated publicly quoted exploration firm, Subco. A deal that will create a synergistic framework from which to approach other strategically optimum acquisitions, including a 50/50 JV on a significant, highly prospective gold property in AZ currently un-owned by either company. The July report also went into the company’s better-than-expected financial performance despite increased outlays due to accelerated exploration expenses. Also covered were new income stream initiatives and other activities, especially in concert with NMGL, where cooperative possibilities promise to stimulate logistical growth for both operations.

For more information on GNCC Capital, visit www.GNCC-Capital.com

Let us hear your thoughts below:

Archives

Select A Month
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • Market Basics

    New to the micro-cap markets?Get answers to your questions about investing in Small-Cap / Micro-Cap Stocks and learn how to protect yourself.

    The Basics

    Newsletter Publishers

    Have an up and coming newsletter and want to be included in our coverage list? Looking to get more coverage and grow subscriptions? Register for coverage.

    Register

    Public Companies

    Are you a Small-Cap / Micro-Cap company looking for coverage? We'd love to hear from you. Fill out our quick contact form or send us a text.

    Get Covered